Technical basis
Engineering that survives review
We would rather bring in a national laboratory or university partner early than discover a problem during diligence.
01 / Current work
A live pipeline, stated plainly
The projects below reflect active discussions and programme work at their current stage. Status is intentionally precise.
Materials compatibility and fuel-wedge testingDOE GAIN voucher
In preparation
Project financing facilityLetter of intent
In structuring
Indiana baseload deploymentCommercial counterparty
In structuring
Coupled simulation programmeNational laboratory
Early stage
Southeast Asia deployment enquiry
Early stage
Sub-Saharan Africa deployment enquiry
Early stage
European Union and Canada market assessment
Early stage
Status reflects current stage. Items marked in structuring or early stage are under discussion and are not binding commitments. No item listed here represents executed financing, a construction contract or a regulatory approval. Detail on any listed item is available under NDA to qualified counterparties.
02 / How we engage
Meet projects where they are
Projects reach us at different stages. What they have in common is a technical basis that holds up and a sponsor without a route to institutional capital.
Step 01
Assessment
We look at the technical basis, the sponsor, the offtake position and the regulatory path. If any one of those cannot be resolved, we say so early rather than late.
Step 02
Structuring
Work on the financing structure runs alongside the technical programme, not after it. Licensing pathway, siting and offtake are treated as design inputs.
Step 03
Capital formation
Introductions and structuring support for sponsors holding assets or contracted cash flows but no route to a bank credit committee.
Investment Science LLC is affiliated with You Get Energy through common management. Capital formation work involving both entities is conducted on that basis and disclosed to counterparties.
03 / What we look for
Conditions that make a project workable
Not every project is a fit. These are the conditions that make one workable, and their absence is usually the reason we decline.
Sponsor position
Assets, cash flows or offtake
A sponsor holding real assets, contracted cash flows or a defensible offtake position, rather than a concept seeking validation.
Regulatory path
A route that can be named
A licensing route that can be named and scheduled. For advanced reactors, the choice among NRC pathways including 10 CFR Part 53 is now a live strategic decision.
Deployment logic
Load that needs the technology
Remote industrial sites, defence installations and off-grid processing are where a transportable reactor earns its cost.
Timeline honesty
Schedules built for reality
A schedule that reflects licensing and construction reality. Optimistic timelines do not survive contact with an allocator's technical adviser.
We hold ourselves to the same list. The status column above is written the way we would want a counterparty's pipeline written for us.
Continue the conversation
Have a project that needs a route to capital?
Bring us the technical basis, the sponsor position and the problem that needs solving.